HD Awards 2025 - Shortlist Announced
Marsworth Wharf

Marsworth Wharf

Completed

Winner

Planning Application Link View map

Number/street name:
Watery Lane, Marsworth, Buckinghamshire, UK

Address line 2:

City:
Marsworth

Postcode:
HP23 4BW

Architect:
Stride Treglown

Architect contact number:


Developer:
Canal's and Rivers Trust.

Contractor:
Hyatt Construction Ltd

Planning Authority:
Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area

Planning consultant:
NULL

Planning Reference:
18/03015/APP 22/04312/CPL

Date of Completion:

Schedule of Accommodation:
2 x 5 bed house, 5 x 3 bed house, 6 x 4 bed house

Tenure Mix:
100% Private Rent

Total number of homes:


Site size (hectares):
0.53

Net Density (homes per hectare):
24.5

Size of principal unit (sq m):
149

Smallest Unit (sq m):
121

Largest unit (sq m):
209

No of parking spaces:
29

Scheme PDF Download



Planning History

- Architects appointed by letter: May 2008
- Planning submission: (First) October 2009 (Second) June 2010
- Planning permission granted: April 2012
- Construction begins (under LOI): March 2014
- Contract novation signed: May 2014
- Completion date: September 2015

The site was previously a vacant plot, with no known development. The site forms part of the Lord Radnor estate and is set within the curtilage of the associated listed buildings. Permissions have been sought for the overall site, which has been subdivided into four phases; with this being the first phase.

The Design Process

The site was previously a vacant plot, with no known development. The site forms part of the Lord Radnor estate and is set within the curtilage of the associated listed buildings. Permissions have been sought for the overall site, which has been subdivided into four phases; with this being the first phase.

Prior to the planning submission a number of informal meetings with the
local authority case officer were held, to discuss the potential development
and an appropriate design and density. A public consultation was also
held where people of the local village parish were given the chance to
share their thoughts and comments.
The planning application was met with 130 objections from local residents
who had formed an action group to speak as one voice against the
development. Their main objection was to the perceived increase in
traffic in the area and loss of the carpenters workshop. They felt that the
industrial canal character of the conservation area was being threatened
by not making use of the existing structure. The former workshop, built in
the late 19th century with the development of the canals, was not listed
and had little architectural merit itself but, English Heritage argued, did
form part of the canal heritage as a working, industrial transport network.
Following the planning feedback, an amended brief was agreed and the
scheme was redesigned. The existing former carpenters workshop was
retained, refurbished and extended to create a 3 bedroom house and
the surrounding blocks scaled back to be more respectful of the historic
building.
0 10 20 30 40 50
Site plan 1 : 500
N
Elevation block A 1: 200
Elevation block B 1: 200
Elevation block C 1: 200
Elevation block D 1: 200
Block A
Typical block plan
1: 200
1 Ground floor plan
2 First floor plan
Block B
Typical block plan
1: 200
1 Ground floor plan
2 First floor plan
Block C
Typical block plan
1: 200
1 Ground floor plan
2 First floor plan
Block D
Typical block plan
1: 200
1 Ground floor plan
2 First floor plan
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
MARSWORTH
SITE
Site location map
View 1 - Existing site
View 2 - Aerial view CGI
View 3 - Block C balconies
http://www.stridetreglown.com Website content, copy and CGIs images are controlled by Stride Treglown Plc.
Unless otherwise noted, all information is protected by copyrights and trademarks and is owned or licensed by Stride Treglown Plc.
Photography is either owned by Stride Treglown Plc or permission from a photographer is always confirmed before use.
N
2
3
7
6
5
1
4

Download PDF

Scheme Information

Size

  • 161m2

Sustainability

  • Sustainable urban Drainage Systems

Sustainability

Next
Previous